http://europeanjournalists.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/JClJuncker-docx.pdf
website: http://europeanjournalists.org •
Open letter to Mr Juncker:
Mr Jean-Claude Juncker
President of the European Commission
Rue de la Loi,
200 1049 Brussels
24 April 2015, Brussels
Dear President Juncker,
The European Federation of Journalists (EFJ), together with its affiliate in Luxemburg, the Association of Luxembourgers Journalists (ALJ) are very alarmed by legal proceedings launched by the Luxemburg authority against the French investigative journalist Edward Perrin, who was among the journalists revealing the tax avoidance scandal “LuxLeaks”.
According to a statement issued by the prosecutors’ office on 23 April, the investigative judge charged a French journalist (who has been identified as Edward Perrin) accused of being a co-author, if not an accomplice in crimes committed by a former PwC employee.
We consider that the charges against Perrin are disproportionate and violate Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 11 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights which guarantee the right to freedom of expression and information.
We strongly believe that the public interest arguments in the “LuxLeaks” case are compelling. Following the revelation, it has led to heated public debates among citizens and policy makers about loopholes in taxation systems across the EU. The European Parliament has also set up a special committee on tax rulings. It is evident that the investigation and reporting of the “LuxLeaks” has been conducted in the public interest with the aim to inform the public that a small, privileged group of multinational corporations are given favourable tax regimes.
We would also like to draw your attention to the Council of Europe Recommendation on the Protection of Whistle-blowers on 30 April 2014: Individuals who report or disclose information on threats or harm to the public interest (“whistle-blowers”) should be given the protection because disclosing such information can contribute to strengthening transparency and democratic accountability.
Journalists have the right to protect their confidential sources. During investigations, they often rely whistle-blowers to provide information in order to reveal the wrong-doings of officials or unjust systems. The prosecution of whistle-blowers in the “LuxLeaks” would have a serious impact on investigative journalism.
With this letter, we call on you and the First Vice-President, Mr. Frans Timmermans, who is also in charge of the Charter of Fundamental Rights to take the necessary measures to ensure that Luxemburg respects the European Union laws on freedom of expression and information.
We would also like to remind you that on 30 July 2014, you have responded to a letter from us requesting for a meeting with you. We would very much appreciate to meet with you and your cabinet soon to discuss further this particular issue and our concerns.
Thank you and we are looking forward to meeting you soon.
CC: Mr. Frans Timmermans, First Vice-President of the European Commission, Commissioner Better Regulation, Inter-Institutional Relations, Rule of Law and Charter of Fundamental Rights Best regards
Ricardo Gutiérrez, EFJ General Secretary
Roger Infalt, ALJ President
Mogens Blicher Bjerregård, EFJ President
___________________________________________
APRIL 2ND 2016 CORRUPTION CASE IN LUXEMBOURG. SOLIDARITY WITH ANTOINE DELTOUR AND EDOUARD PERRIN FROM THE LANDSBANKI VICTIMS OF FRAUD
A solidarity committee with Antoine Deltour and Edouard Perrin created in Luxembourg
Despite the holiday period, about thirty people gathered on Friday 1 April, during the noon hour, union casino in Luxembourg-Bonnevoie, to proceed with the formal establishment of a solidarity committee with Antoine Deltour and Edouard Perrin. An earlier call for the launch of such a committee had already gathered about twenty activists, human rights activists, journalists and lawyers. In addition to those who could be present, twenty other people from different sides and areas of activity, joined them to organize solidarity with Antoine Deltour and Edouard Perrin.
It was decided to maintain the call for the launch of the solidarity committee in Luxembourg as a base and platform. The committee’s goal is not to debate about taxes, a fairer taxation or the “rulings” that were the basis of the scandal “Luxleaks” but to organize solidarity with the two people whose courage allowed to publicly reveal the size of the tax evasion Luxembourg and, subsequently, in almost all countries of Europe (and beyond).
The revelations of Deltour and Perrin are the source of a wide movement control and containment of tax avoidance abuse of multinationals, leading discussions and special committee in the European Parliament, the G20 – a move that is not certainly not yet complete. The general interest of the revelations made by Antoine Deltour widely prevalent offenses (copies of hundreds of “tax rulings” – tax agreements concluded by the Luxembourg tax authorities on behalf of multinationals). The dissemination of this information by Edouard Perrin meets a right to information. Thus, the issue of solidarity with Antoine Deltour and Edouard Perrin at the trial which will start on April 26 aims first to penalize by imprisonment or fines those who launched even relayed the alert. But the challenge is also the right to information and protection of sources of the press.
As of now, the solidarity committee has scheduled three concrete actions:
1) The establishment of a website www.solidarite-deltour-perrin.lu (*), which each have the opportunity to sign the solidarity appeal with Antoine Deltour and Edouard Perrin. In addition, the site will inform about all actions of solidarity.
2) the evening of April 26, the day the trial began Deltour and Perrin, and already the day before, there will be a great evening of solidarity with showing testimonies and interventions and highlighting the usefulness of their brave and selfless action. – Details of this event will follow.
3) Before the trial opened on April 26, a rally will take place on the shelf of the Holy Spirit, not to put pressure on justice, but to publicly express solidarity with Antoine Deltour and Edouard Perrin.
The support committee will follow the trial and will continue to support and Antoine Edouard throughout the legal proceedings.
(*) The line-up of the site is scheduled for Saturday, April 2, 2016
_____________________________________________________________________________
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2834015/Hypocrite-s-bad-EU-s-new-chief-bullying-boozy-federalist-zealot-man-wants-run-affairs-dock-massive-tax-avoidance-country.htmlBy Daniel Hannan MEP, for the Daily Mail
Published: 01:01 GMT, 14 November 2014The man who leads the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker (pictured), was, it seems, responsible for Luxembourg’s dodgy tax regime
What a typical, hypocritcal, stinking Euro-shambles.Leaked documents indicate that Luxembourg has been offering secretive deals to mega-corporations which allow them to pay almost no tax.Some 28,000 pages have come to light and what they show is ugly.Luxembourg, for all its notional commitment to international norms on tax disclosure and transparency, appears to have allowed multi-nationals to strike special deals clandestinely.
Over the years, Luxembourg, as a tax haven, has offered global giants such as Vodafone and GlaxoSmith-Kline the opportunity to escape tax by channelling their billions through the Grand Duchy’s companies.
Not surprisingly, the French, Dutch and German governments are furious.
As they see it, Luxembourg has been luring investment away from their jurisdictions by doing things in private which it was not prepared to admit in public.
The European Commission, too, is riled, and has announced an investigation.
There is just one catch. The man who leads the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, was, it seems, responsible for Luxembourg’s dodgy tax regime.
He served as prime minister for 17 years and was simultaneously finance minister for much of that time.
Like so many European Commissioners before him, Juncker was given the Brussels job after being rejected by his domestic electorate.
The European Commission has this unusual distinction of being not so much undemocratic as anti-democratic, in the sense that people generally get appointed only after being rejected by their voters.
Neil Kinnock (who lost two consecutive general elections for Labour) and Chris Patten (who, despite being Tory chairman in 1992, lost his own parliamentary seat) are two supreme examples.
It would, of course, be absurd to have President Juncker investigate former Prime Minister Juncker.
The Luxembourger has therefore announced an independent inquiry, and it would be wrong to anticipate its findings.
Still, the critics can hardly be blamed for asking very embarrassing questions.
This, after all, is the man who, at the height of the financial crisis in the Eurozone, blithely insisted that bailouts were not needed.
Everyone knew they were coming, but he kept denying them, supposedly to reassure the markets.
He was also the man who cheerfully explained that ‘when it gets serious, you have to lie’.
Well, Mr Juncker, it’s looking pretty serious now.
Just weeks after taking office, the new Commission has been badly weakened.
Bloomberg, the world’s leading financial news service, has called for Juncker to stand down – and plenty of Brussels officials and politicians privately agree.
The Grand Duchy won its status as an attractive corporate tax haven thanks to its position at the heart of Europe, having been a founder member of the European Economic Community in 1957.
Like so many European Commissioners before him, Jean-Claude Juncker (pictured) was given the Brussels job after being rejected by his domestic electorate
Like so many European Commissioners before him, Jean-Claude Juncker (pictured) was given the Brussels job after being rejected by his domestic electorate
Despite his homeland’s questionable reputation, Brussels politicians – almost to a man and woman – recently voted Juncker into office.
Of the 28 member countries, only two, the UK and Hungary, stood apart from the fawning crowd.
Inevitably, the big blocs of Euro-integrationist MEPs, the Socialists, Liberals and Christian Democrats, were quick to endorse him.
Yet, almost none of them did so with enthusiasm. It was almost impossible to find anyone with a good word for Juncker at the time.
He was, Brussels insiders mournfully told each other, fond of a drink and rude to staff, abrupt and abrasive, with a short attention span and a shorter temper.
He had quit as Luxembourg’s prime minister after a huge scandal over the country’s security services’ abuse of their power under his watch – allegedly placing illegal wiretaps to monitor leading national figures.
It is discreditable that so many national leaders voted for Jean-Claude Juncker despite his manifest flaws
Mr Juncker’s lack of suitability for the top EU job was plain to see, and it is discreditable that so many MEPs and so many national leaders voted for him despite his manifest flaws.
I mentioned at the time that you could barely find a single politician or official who was privately prepared to defend him. But, as often happens on these occasions, a collective suspension of disbelief set in.
Why, then, was he appointed? It’s hardly as though it was Luxembourg’s turn. The Grand Duchy has about the same number of inhabitants as Sheffield.
It accounts for 0.06 per cent of the EU’s population but has supplied three Commission presidents – the only country to have done so.
In truth, Juncker had just one recommendation to arch-federalists; one that, it seems, cancelled out all the drawbacks.
He was, and is, an extreme advocate of turning Europe into something like a single country.
He wants an EU police force and army, a pan-European minimum wage, and a common EU citizenship with voting rights in all national elections.
In the current ‘Europe right or wrong’ atmosphere that dominates Brussels, this is all that counts.
Euro-enthusiasts warmly approved of the way Juncker prioritised the survival of the euro over the prosperity of the people who used it.
Even as unemployment reached critical levels in Spain and Greece, he made clear that nothing would be allowed to call into question the ‘irreversibility’ of monetary union.
He took the same undemocratic attitude to political union. When the French and Dutch people threw out the European Constitution in referendums in 2005, Juncker perversely declared that ‘the French and Dutch have not voted No’.
T o the rest of us, it seemed like some sort of joke, but Euro-federalists roared their approval. And, sure enough, the votes were disregarded and the constitution imposed anyway under a new name.
Nor have his opinions mellowed since then.
In his first speech to MEPs following his election in May, Juncker began by praising the father of Euro-federalism, French socialist Jacques Delors, and described the euro as a source of protection in an unstable world. (Not a view shared, I’d have thought, by the 19 million unemployed in the Eurozone.)
He went on to call for fiscal union, a bigger budget and the amalgamation of national foreign policies.
Although few heads of government liked him – they had spent too many summits in his presence – he still attracts widespread support from Euro-federalists.
Not quite so with the public, though. A major poll carried out immediately after his election found that across the EU as a whole, only 8.2 per cent of voters had heard of Juncker.
Still, Eurocrats and politicians suspended their disbelief and pretended that Juncker had secured some sort of democratic mandate.
Juncker appears, like so many Eurocrats before him, to have been saying one thing in public and doing another in private
What makes these new revelations so awkward is that, as a candidate, Juncker campaigned for tax harmonisation.
The long-term solution to the euro crisis, he said, was to have a common fiscal policy, leading, ultimately, to taxes being directly levied by Brussels.
The leaked documents, to put this as neutrally as I can, are very hard to square with that official policy.
The fact is that, if true, they are a devastating exposure of Juncker’s hypocrisy: on the one hand, he is a leading advocate of tax harmonisation across the 28 countries of the EU, but on the other, he is an unapologetic central player in a multi-billion-pound tax avoidance scheme based in just one of those countries – his own.
Don’t get me wrong: I’m all for tax competition between nations, provided it’s transparent. Competition, after all, is what keeps tax rates down.
But Juncker appears, like so many Eurocrats before him, to have been saying one thing in public and doing another in private.
Where does all this leave Britain? Well, it was to David Cameron’s credit that he resisted the pressure to endorse Juncker.
Some other national leaders may well be feeling a little sheepish now. So, I suspect, are a lot of the MEPs who backed the Juncker Commission.
Still, being right when others have made a mistake is not a comfortable position in this case. Nobody likes a smart-aleck.
Indeed, I’ve noticed, since the euro crisis began, that Britain has become much more unpopular in Brussels. Every new setback for the EU, including this one, somehow ends up being Britain’s fault.
Nonetheless, Juncker’s palpable disqualifications will surely strengthen the hand of those who want a free-trade rather than political relationship with the EU.
Just one look at this tainted individual leads to one inevitable question: Is this really the type of man we want governing us?
DANIEL HANNAN is a Conservative MEP
__________________________________
CORRUPTION AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL IN LUXEMBOURG ?
We have been telling our friends in Luxembourg for 6 years, that the Landsbanki bankruptcy scandal with the abuse of European pensioners, was severely damaging Luxembourg’s image and awakening International attention to the behind-the-doors, illicit Financial Trafficking going on.
Rogue members of the Judiciary seem to have been especially selected to classify criminal files and make fraud and money laundering another ‘Made In Luxembourg’ speciality to be brushed aside by the Politicians in awe and fear of Juncker who set the whole Luxembourg “system” up.
The people of Luxembourg are paying for the corrupt ” system” that has taken it’s roots in this beautiful little country.
Luxembourg is now invaded by the least ethical, the most selfish, the gangsters, banksters and crooks and all the companies run by short-sighted greedy men who do not care about the role they are playing in world-wide poverty and the spread of corruption.
The products from these companies are tainted and second-rate now and the consumer will avoid them as consumers avoid any Luxembourg products as even this new government is unwilling to admit that there are serious problems with the laws and with a large section of the judiciary who agree with the abusive methods to protect the financial criminals and continue consumer abuse.
The rotten element in the judiciary will systematically ensure the financial delinquents will win their cases and the consumer loses every time.
Consumer cases are systematically thrown out and the evidence of fraud is systematically ignored by the corrupt within the system.
This is a sad reality which even the brave and eloquent Gaston Vogel, in his letter to Xavier Bettel, could obviously not put out in the public arena. Here is a man who loves Luxembourg as it was before the gangster-bankster invasion, which turned Luxembourg into one BIG BAD BANK!
Gaston Vogel would like the people of Luxembourg to be the most important and for cultural possibilities to be available for the people of Luxembourg as well as shops for them and not that Banks, business and lawlessness should take precedence over what is beautiful , fair and something to be proud of.
Everyone knows, including Juncker, that there are serious problems in the laws and in the way some lawyers and judges handle the Financial fraud and money laundering cases.
However, is this not what Juncker & cronies wanted when they encouraged criminals and cheats to invade this beautiful little country which has been destroyed by this mass of banksters, nouveaux riches and empty vulgarity that does not belong in what was once a charming, friendly country one would be happy to visit?
Now people are afraid to go to Luxembourg as the chances are you will bump into the worst elements in International society in a concentrated area and you certainly cannot expect justice, as a consumer, from Luxembourg.
Surely the old Luxembourg with it’s real people, small shops for Luxembourgeois families, local restaurants and traditions, local produce, was better than this cold place for behind-closed-doors dirty business and lawlessness upheld by a judiciary which is clearly not fit for purpose?
How can a few courageous, ethical, professional lawyers stand up and change what so many of their colleagues are refusing to clean-up?
We warned our friends in Luxembourg about the International damage Yvette Hamilius was causing to Luxembourg.
All you have to do is to read all our Facebook messages to our friends in Luxembourg who are not in finance and do not deserve to pay for the banking Crimes any more than we do and you can read what we have been saying for years.
This scandal was because no one did anything to stop the abuse of ordinary consumers across the world as big and powerful banks, companies, dictators and criminals were protected just to get their money into the Luxembourg banks.
The outrageous behaviour of the judiciary protecting this fraudulent bankruptcy administration and the arrogance and lies of the administrator Yvette Hamilius, was being noticed by International Reporters who were contacting us to see the evidences of fraud in our files.
We have had politicians and Journalists wanting to examine our files and this is not just from Europe but from other countries.
These people from across the world who were beginning to see that there were far worse things than Tax evasion being trafficked through Luxembourg and that the Icelandic crash was greatly enabled by the Luxembourg financial Place and it’s rogue members of the judiciary where even the Procureur Generel or Attorney general, Robert Biever, was seen to leap into the defence of a Criminally accused bank and an administrator who is under suspicion of being behind the money laundering of the issue of fraud as she seized assets from the victims of the bankruptcy.
Guess who her lawyer was during these years? None other than the Vice president of the Luxembourg Bar Rosario Grosso.
Guess what rosario Grosso is now?
He is the PRESIDENT of the Bar and Yvette Hamilius, as the people of Luxembourg know, is a Juncker protégé who obviously got her arrogance and tendencies to lie to the people of Luxembourg from the grand master ex PM and now PRESIDENT of the European Union.
What a stitch-up! How sad to see the new government grovelling and crawling around humiliating the people of Luxembourg even more, by jumping to protect Juncker, who is the reason Luxembourg is not for the Luxembourgeois any more , but for the Bangsters, cheats and crooks of the world who know they can count on a bent “system”, protected by lawlessness and manipulation of laws and rules to fit the Financial crimes those who have invaded Luxembourg need.
We told the good people of Luxembourg who are our friends, that this scandal was going to destroy Luxembourg’s reputation as it was bringing the other Financial scandals into public attention and the Juncker supporters were too used to doing what they wanted with no sanction.
What we were saying to the ordinary citizens of Luxembourg, was true.
The powerful judiciary and politicians continuing with the Juncker penchant for encouraging, protecting and denying Financial Crime, was going to destroy Luxembourg in the long run.
Our lives have been destroyed and the Luxembourg reputation has been destroyed just like we said it would and we all know there are serious crimes being protected by those like Hamilius protesting there is “no fraud”and “no problem”in the file they do not want investigated.
Luxembourg has destroyed good, decent people to protect the worst people in society and all that for money which is not for the citizens of Luxembourg.
Why are even the new Politicians voted in for CHANGE and TRANSPARENCY,still in DENIAL?
Juncker was surrounded by all those in the Conflict of Interests game, colluding alongside him to enable Financial delinquency, Financial Crime and abuse of the consumer and investor and have transformed Luxembourg into one BIG BAD Bank with a judiciary not fit for the purpose of putting a STOP to everything which is abusive.
There are excellent ethical lawyers in Luxembourg, but they do not have a voice when those in the powerful spots want to continue the Juncker financial delinquency regime which has destroyed their country for their citizens.
_____________________________________________
GROUP OF VICTIMS WRITES:
4th April 2014
A BANKRUPTCY ADMINISTRATION FROM HELL…
In Luxembourg in the heart of the E.U. in the hands of the Luxembourg Financial administrator, Yvette Hamilius and her supervising judge Karin Guillaume.
How NOT to do things in Europe today.
LUXEMBOURG COURTS in Landsbanki Case First Instance and Appeal.
Example shown below of a case with 200 DAYS OF DELAYS to create maximum cost, stress and anguish to victims and to ensure they LOSE in first instance and appeal and cannot afford to go on to Cassation especially when Luxembourg lawyers say ‘there is no point, you are almost 100% certain to lose despite the strength of your case. This is why you will lose and it is very expensive”!
This scandal is not fair on the people of Luxembourg.
This scandal is not fair on the European pensioners who are fighting for justice for over 6 years with 22 deaths of fellow victims, attempted suicides and serious stress-related illness in hundreds of victims whose lives have been destroyed by an abusive administration rather than by a bankruptcy of a bank.
Such abhorrent rudeness and arrogance from the lawyer administrator, Yvette Hamilus has never been seen before in London, France and Spain.
In this disgraceful case of abuse of power and conflict of interests by a Luxembourg lawyer, TOP lawyers in London and France have protested openly and even written letters of complaint for the Courts.
International press (outside Luxembourg, of course, have voiced the outrage felt particularly within the European legal profession, about the lack of professionalism, ethics and RESPECT that is being put on display in the name of the Luxembourg Justice system.) Yvette Hamilius is a lose canon for Luxembourg.
Is this fair to all the ethical, honourable lawyers and judges in Luxembourg who are embarrassed and ashamed of the international circus performance this legal Tandem has put on display in the name of Luxembourg?
NO IT IS NOT!
The Hamlius/Guillaume spectacle of an ADMINISTRATION FROM HELL, is destroying the lives of thousands of people in Europe and damaging Luxembourg in the process.
The European Commission must look into the breaches of E.U. law and ethics which is being used to undermine and take advantage of the E.U. by abusing the rulings to Financial advantage and to win cases where there is evidence of serious LAUNDERING OF FINANCIAL CRIME.
Here is a case showing the 200 DAYS of DELAYS or the Luxembourg Court experience of victims of Yvette Hamilius and Karin Guillaume’s administration of
LANDSBANKI LUXEMBOURG S.A.
The clients of course LOST in first instance and in appeal and their case was not even looked into as lie upon lie was accepted in the Luxembourg Courts without proper investigation, accepting all the lies by the administrator.
LIES? YES, BLATANT LIES in order to win.
Luxembourg has been lied to, the honourable judges have been lied to and the Procureur, ROBERT BIEVER, was probably lied to, in view of the embarrassing interview he gave in the press, in speedy defence of the Guillaume/Hamilius Tandem, obviously not having looked into the individual cases where fraud is evident, but simply taken their word as a lawyer and a judge.
Ethics and laws and rulings ratified by Luxembourg’s LUC FRIEDEN, have been trashed, by the administration, as the NEED and GREED to win, possesses the lawyer and judge who ignore the rulings on the professional duty to investigate and denounce all allegations of false accounting and suspicious transactions and embezzled money which could show the possibilities of MONEY LAUNDERING we have been suspecting and denouncing for years, as European citizens, victims of Financial Fraud and the LAUNDERING OF FINANCIAL CRIME BY A LUXEMBOURG ADMINISTRATION.
The clients of course LOST in first instance and in appeal were advised by 2 top Luxembourg law firms that there was NO POINT going to Cassation as they would LOSE and they could not afford to pay as the First instance and the appeal had cost everything and no one had listened to the evidence of serious financial crime.
They were UP AGAINST A WALL of cover-up of Financial Crime in the heart of Europe.
This case, as so many others was doomed to be lost from the outset like all those who were deliberately intended to ‘MISS THE TRAIN” after the HAMILIUS/GUILLAUME Tandem created as much confusion as possible around the important Deadline of Declaration of Claims which they changed the date of and then announced the new date in a couple of obscure newspapers the pensioners would never read.
Not in DURABLE MEDIUM or recorded delivery letters like all the demands for money were sent to the clients!
How clever Y.Hamilius and her Luxembourg lawyers must have thought they were, to get so many victims to “MISS THE TRAIN’ and so automatically lose their case!
ROSARIO GROSSO in peacock mode, was so confident that Hamilius was not breaching any E.U. rules and regulations and had not lied by omission of fact, document, letters and truth to him and ROBERT BIEVER, that he too JOINED THE CIRCUS performance without checking the facts and the correspondance to Hamilius from victims who were desperately trying to pay back what they drew down from the bank for years and were be
14 thoughts on “Journalists corner”
Comments are closed.
There are several people wondering the same as I am and this is if we send the letters we have written with the replies from the Landsbanki administration, can we put them on the site?
We wanted to do this as we are all angry when we read the Luxembourg press saying that we are rich and did not want to pay back what we owed? Landsbanki has been demanding what we do not owe and our correspondence over the years shows how badly we have been treated and how many lies have been told.
It would be good to see some of this displayed for the public to see for itself.
Is this possible?
That is an interesting question. We think that you have to consider carefully what problems might arise from this action although as presumably all correspondence is “open” then you might ask “What have we got to loose” It would certainly give readers an idea of what victims have been going through for the last 4 years. Therefore we would suggest the choice is entirely yours.
We understand. But in spite of all the threats and ultimatums from Luxembourg, we feel that we must expose the truth and everyone should get a chance to expose it which is why a site is essential . It is right we should all work together as for all these years we have felt alone when there are hundreds of us!
We will send our letters and documents like the others have done. Thanks.
HORSEMEAT FRAUD OR BANK FRAUD?
WHICH IS THE MOST IMPORTANT IN LUXEMBOURG?
I would like to add that our family and friends are all asking the same question:
” Why is it that Luxembourg is so quick to react to horsemeat fraud and mis-selling, abuse of the consumer and false description of a product, when they do not lift a finger over serious abuse, mis-selling FRAUD, harassment of the consumer and false descriptions of a product in the Landsbanki Luxembourg fraud case?”
For nearly 5 years European pensioners, most unable to use a computer as average age 72, have been psychologically tortured, intimidated and bullied by an administration which refuses to look into the serious accusations across Europe of fraud against Landsbanki Luxembourg. No questions are being asked in Luxembourg despite several ongoing Criminal proceedings going on by the top French Criminal judge, the EU Court and Spanish and Iceland courts.
Can we take it to mean that Horsemeat Fraud is taken more seriously in Luxemourg than Serious Bank Fraud against pensioners?
What makes Horsemeat Fraud more important than Bank Fraud against 600 pensioners?
Please ask this question in the site Journalists Corner and on our Facebook.
Thank you from all of us.
Just read the Memo from the British Embassy which does sort of prove the point that even they in diplomatic speak appreciate that we have been conned. Pity we can’t get more action from them
Nina, there are many things that point to the fact that it is getting more and more well known that there has been serious cover-up of serious law-breaking.
Can one not tell this above all by the way ,after the damage is done and no repair has been made, nor blame placed clearly where it belongs, attempts are made to re-adjust rules and laws?
Just look at the way the Luxembourg Central Bank gave the failed Landsbanki a massive loan, based on the property assets which are mostly our homes and so do what would appear to be artificially delay the insolvency declaration?
Just look at what the document on Insolvency from 2010 says about that!
Check the link. We are reading through the document. It is so useful to have all these documents at hand. This site is helping us all get our facts straight.
An article by a French victim.
LE SCANDALE FINANCIER DE L’ ADMINISTRATION DE LANDSBANKI LUXEMBOURG
EST L’ UNE DES PLUS IMPORTANTES SCANDALES DE
L’ HISTOIRE BANQUAIRE EUROPÉENNE.
Aujourd’hui nous savons que CE SCANDALE NE SE PASSERAS PAS SOUS SILENCE!
Les victimes de ces agissements criminelles et incorrects par Landsbanki, les victimes des manipulations de comptabilité afin de transformer des Créditeurs en Débiteurs et de saisir leurs maisons, les victimes de l’abus depuis 5 ans et la façon déplorable que des centaines de clients d’une banque Luxembourgeoise ont été traiter par l’administration de Landsbanki Luxembourg qui ont demander a Luxembourg de mener des investigations complètes afin que toute la vérité apparaisse dans ce scandale financier sans précédant, sont contents que aujourd’hui, enfin, le scandale est reconnu a Luxembourg et que la vérité et la transparence soit a l’ordre du jour.
Ce scandale fait surface au même temps que des autres scandales a Luxembourg et aujourd’hui on voit la détermination de mettre en évidence ce qui a été mis de coté pendant des années. BRAVO!
Cette scandaleuse affaire de la liquidation de Landsbanki, au coeur de l’ Europe a été trop longtemps négligé et ignoré et aujourd’hui les centaines de retraités , leurs familles et leurs amis, perdent leur patience et la colère monte avec chaque lettre recommandée et chaque visite de l’ huissier exigeant paiement des sommes manipulé , injustifiée que l’administrateur a REFUSER DE CORRIGER depuis des années, malgré les demandes des victimes qui étaient d’accord de rembourser la somme JUSTE , depuis des années suivi d’un refus systématique.
Ce refus de corriger les manipulations de comptabilité dans la SCR, de rectifier tous les agissements non-contractuelles et le flagrant abus de la SCR qui a déclencher la demande immédiate des sommes entre 3 et 7 fois la somme prise de la banque et qui a immédiatement déclencher la saisie des maisons en France , est particulièrement choquant.
Que tous ça se passe sous silence sans contrôle ou de supervision judiciaire a Luxembourg pendant si longtemps est inacceptable en Europe et ceci est en conflit avec les lois des consommateurs , le MiFed et les droits humains a notre avis.
Comment quantifier La souffrance psychologique des centaines des retraités qui ont fait confiance au Luxembourg et qui se voit bafoués, ignorés et traités comme des criminelles et qui subissent l’horreur de la peur de perdre leurs maisons de famille qui sont le fruit d’ une vie de travaille?
Comment quantifier cette peur?
Comment quantifier l’humiliation ?
Comment quantifier la souffrance des enfants et des petits enfants, des familles et amis qui regarde impuissants pendant que le Luxembourg ferme les yeux et prétend que ce n’est qu’ un problème Icelandais, quand les faits et les procédures criminelles a travers l’Europe prouvent le contraire?
On constate une virulence démesuré envers certains clients surtout des clients qui était devenu clients de Landsbanki Luxembourg que depuis 2008 en FRANCE.
1. Pourquoi cette acharnement a certains clients qui ont eu leurs prêts enregistrer aux hypothèques en 2008 quand la banque était déjà Insolvable? POURQUOI CETTE DISPARITÉ?
2. Pourquoi avoir terroriser et abuser particulièrement ceux qui ont enregistrer leurs prêts que quelques mois avant la déclaration tardive de la faillite, quand Landsbanki était déjà insolvable et ils aurais du être interdit de fonctionner depuis 2007?
3. Est- ce acceptable quand les contrats étaient d’ une durée de 20 ans?
4. Est-ce que ça pourrai être la raison que les maisons ont été tous et partout a travers la France et l’Espagne, dévalués sans aucune expertise, a 60% de la valeur qui était souvent déjà une sous- estimation avant la rénovation des propriétés?
5. Est ce que ça pourrais expliquer la dévaluation soudaine, sans logique ni expertise, de l’argent dans les comptes personnelles qui a disparu sans justification? ( Inutile de dire que l’administrateur n’as pas le droit de mettre fin au prêt si créditeur ).
6. Est-ce-qu’ Il ne fallait pas la manipulation du SCR au même temps que la banque était finalement officiellement déclarer insolvent afin de convertir les Créditeurs en Débiteurs et récupérer leurs biens?
Ces 3 manipulations et d’ autres encore, ont effectivement transformer des CRÉDITEURS en DÉBITEURS et a permis a Landsbanki Luxembourg de déclencher abusivement l’appel de fonds afin de pouvoir saisir les maisons et essayer d’extorquer entre 3 et 7 fois ce que les clients avaient en réalité pris de la banque.
C’est certainement pour ces raisons que l’administration de Landsbanki Luxembourg est dénoncée et aussi parceque Landsbanki n’exécute pas ses obligations contractuelles .
Nous sommes des victimes d’agissements incorrectes par Landsbanki lors de la liquidation et nous espérons que le Luxembourg puisse au plus vite mettre fin a cette souffrance et injustice envers des centaines de personnes dans les dernières précieuses années de leurs vie.
Article on: ‘ OPINIONS ON LUXEMBOURG CRISIS’
LUXEMBOURG:
THE FOURTH MAJOR SCANDAL is ONE TOO MANY to COVER-UP
1st scandal — National Stadium failure. Uncontrolled corruption
2nd scandal— CARGOLUX, KBL, BIL sales, Al Jazeera/ SES,
3rd scandal— M.P. & /secret Service Spying and moles, bombings and uncontrolled corruption,
4th scandal— Landsbanki Luxembourg Insolvency administration- the tangled web of abuse, corruption, embezzlement, fraud, mis-selling and harassment of European pensioners. As yet Uncontrolled corruption.
1st SCANDAL Real estate project combined with a National Stadium project where corruption, threats, blackmail and serious string-pulling between Politicians, entrepreneurs and environmentalists – fighting with all the venom greed can fuel- led to the failure of the project which would have greatly benefited the population of Luxembourg.
N.B. All attempts to investigate the blackmail, threats and illegal acts WAS VOTED DOWN IN PARLIAMENT.
The people of Luxembourg were furious but NOTHING WAS DONE.
2nd SCANDAL Questionable price fixing and serious manipulations over the sale under Luc Frieden the Minister of Finance of 35% of CARGOLUX to Qatar airways $117.5 million. Then there was the KBL and BIL Banks sold to Qatar as well as the questionable linking of The Luxembourg satellite company SES with Al Jazeera.
Price fixing, manipulation, suspicious dealings but yet again, any attempts to investigate all threats, wrongdoings, manipulation of prices etc. were VOTED DOWN BY LUXEMBOURG PARLIAMENT.
The people of Luxembourg were furious but NOTHING WAS DONE.
3rd SCANDAL. The head of SREL, the Luxembourg spying agency had 4 years ago, secretly recorded a conversation between them and Mr.Juncker. A recording device in a wristwatch was used. Mr. Juncker, had placed a mole in the spying and learnt about it via his mole. The P.M. Mr Juncker, however, took no legal action. The uncontrolled spying agency was like a plane without a pilot and Luxembourg’s PM was closing his eyes to more and more scandals that he and his co-workers thought could be covered- up by simply ignoring them with what can be seen today as reckless arrogance.
However, the Scandal to be feared most was looming on the horizon like a thundercloud ready to burst and this SCANDAL no 4. concerned Jean Claude Juncker’s primary interest:
THE REPUTATION of the FINANCE and BANKING SECTOR
A Luxembourg Bankrupt Bank and Luxembourg’s reputation as a Financial center to, ‘Trust and Respect’, (as Mr. Juncker asked the world to do), was at stake if the judiciary investigated this scandal properly.
This is probably why it is widely being suggested today, that a clever manipulation tactic was used to manipulate public attention and
to steer media and public prying away from the Scandal of the Landsbanki Insolvency in Luxembourg with it’s long reaching tentacles leading to all that lies in the murky waters beneath.
Luxembourg had closed its eyes and ignored all criminal proceedings across Europe for 4 years whilst the Judiciary ignored all evidence other countries were EXAMINING AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL. The biggest bail of 50 million euros ordered by the highest criminal judge in France was simply ignored by the judiciary. The fine of 1.875.000 euros was not only not paid but DENIED in a press release by Robert Biever the state prosecutor!
There have been Criminal indictments in Iceland and clear links to the embezzlement, fraud and manipulations of money are seen to go systematically through Luxembourg and yet the Justice Minister refers to Icelandic problems in Icelandic crimes, rather than anything to do with Luxembourg whilst the administrator and her supervisor simply say there is no problem that needs investigating in Landsbanki Luxembourg. This sounds like a broken record, which has been played too much in Luxembourg when you look at the way the previous 3 scandals have been handled.
Yet this scandal is said to be the biggest financial scandal in Europe with Luxembourg at the center of the CRIMINAL COMPLEXITIES of embezzlement, fraud and abuse of the elderly. It is the subject of International Conferences on failed insolvency scandals with Landsbanki Luxembourg being cited as the worst in Europe.
A complex scandal running far deeper than what appears on the surface.
Something had to be done as a Criminal complaint had been lodged in Luxembourg, a Criminal proceeding well under way in Iceland, in France and some brewing in Spain.
DISTRACTION WAS URGENTLY NEEDED
Mr. Juncker decided to reveal SCANDAL no 3 thinking perhaps that it could be controlled and that it would lead to a low-risk inquiry, which would make him look good and above all, would take the attention away.
However, things did not go to plan, as Parliament did not dare vote for the third time, for the third scandal against an Official Inquiry.
Twice they voted NO to an inquiry over the first 2 scandals and the people were fuming. Twice OK. Three times was too much.
Also a group of victims of Landsbanki had lodged a Criminal complaint in Luxembourg and to make it worse, the young member of Luxembourg Parliament, Serge Wilmes tabled a motion and had questions for the new justice Minister Octavia Modert regarding the looming scandal.
What was perhaps supposed to be a SIMPLE DISTRACTION TO GET ATTENTION AWAY FROM THE LANDSBANKI SCANDAL, soon turned into a Parliamentary investigation, as it should have been for SCANDAL 1 and SCANDAL 2.
Inevitably, from that simple inquiry into SCANDAL 3, many more were revealed but still leaving many unspoken as the people of Luxembourg have concluded. There were court proceedings in a 25 year old series of TERRORIST ATTACKS on Luxembourg ITSELF, with growing suspicions that it was a plot by security forces, with the Luxembourg Spying agency’s involvement and Mr Juncker had placed a mole there and had turned a blind eye and allowed the Spying agency to fly out of control.
N.B. This little country of 550.000 population had a Spying Agency keeping files on more than 300.000 people of Luxembourg!
Spying on their own people makes cover-ups inevitable as no one dares say anything in such a climate. This brings us to the cover-up of the biggest Financial scandal in Europe.
SCANDAL NO 4. The LANDSBANKI LUXEMBOURG ADMINISTRATION SCANDAL.
The one which will not go away despite being ignored for 5 years and despite the failed attempts at DISTRACTION to get attention away from this financial scandal right on Luxembourg’s doorstep.
The Hundreds of victims of fraud, abuse, mis-selling, manipulation, harassment and false accounting upheld in post- bankruptcy will NOT GO QUIETLY nor be intimidated as had been hoped.
The victims have waited too long and been treated abominably. Mostly in their 70’s with one of 90 years old, these pensioners have been treated as criminals by Luxembourg.
The Trust and Respect’ Mr Juncker pontificated about have gone, much in the same way as the cumulative effect of all these scandals has created distrust in the government for the people of Luxembourg, who like the 600 victims of this abuse, DESERVE BETTER.
Mr. Juncker is determined to continue as before and become Europe’s no 1., or ‘MR EURO’, but will he continue to close his eyes to what is profoundly wrong in his own little Luxembourg and allow the serious crimes and ethical abominations to continue as they have done for so long?
That is the question.
There seems to be plenty of reaction in the International press and Luxembourg is now paying for having turned a blind eye to crime and ignored the abuse of victims for so long it seems.
This is from Der Spiegel english version. There is a German version too.
The Juncker Scandal: Luxembourg’s Dirty Secrets
By Romain Leick
Big scandal in little Luxembourg.Zoom
REUTERS
Big scandal in little Luxembourg.
Luxembourg’s secret services may be tiny, but their misdeeds were enough to bring down one of Europe’s most powerful politicians.
Big fish rarely look upon little fish without condescension. How else do you explain the fact that German media organizations and commentators — like Marietta Slomka, host of the TV news program “heute journal” — refer to the recent events in neighboring Luxembourg as “droll?” The Grand Duchy has an intelligence service? With 60 employees? Or should we say, agents? It’s too funny for words.
ANZEIGE
“Luxembourg as such doesn’t count.” That’s what the Luxembourg newspaper tageblatt concluded with regards to the “Juncker tragedy,” which is, of course, seen as nothing but comedy beyond Luxembourg’s borders. Even in the midst of a scandal, the small nation (or, as some would say, “dwarf country”) isn’t being taken seriously. But that’s a mistake.
Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker has been brought down by a scandal handed to him by the country’s intelligence service, the Service de Renseignement de l’Etat luxembourgeois (SREL). The service, which is supposed to address external security and terrorist threats, reports directly to the head of the government. That’s why a 141-page report by a parliamentary investigation committee found that Juncker holds political responsibility for the illegal operations that SREL officers have conducted for years. The extensive use of Luxembourgish in the mainly French document means that, even without further encryption, it is poorly accessible to outsiders.
Juncker’s Permissive Mistake
The report makes clear that Juncker simply did not treat the intelligence service seriously enough. Most of the time, he didn’t even want to know precisely what was going on. He was satisfied with intimations and preferred to give advice rather than instructions.
A conversation between Juncker and the then director of the SREL, Marco Mille, on Jan. 31, 2007, illustrates how this worked. Unbeknownst to the premier, Mille recorded the conversation with a special wristwatch. The two men were concerned that rumors about illegal wiretapping operations could stir up public unrest.
“We are very vulnerable to people,” Mille said, in Luxembourgish, “who say that the intelligence service does as it pleases, goes over the heads of the premier, the palace [of the Grand Duke], and God knows who else. That’s important to us.”
Juncker replied: “This so-called political espionage, we’re not doing it anymore, anyway. But it was considerable in the past, in the time…”
Mille: “Yes, in the time before 1990, that is, during the Cold War. Well, there was the intelligence service, that was its only patronage, the Russian embassy, the Communist Party and, in the beginning, the Greens…”
Juncker: “But for no reason, in my opinion.”
Mille: “Yes, but then, seen from today’s perspective, with your philosophy — which is also mine — but…”
Juncker: “But there is no reason, for the Greens…”
Mille: “And even when you look at the way people thought at the time … Anyone who wasn’t strictly conservative was considered a threat to the state… We have 300,000 index cards in the basement.”
Luxembourg has a population of 525,000.
Even if the number Mille cited was exaggerated, the dialogue between the two men shows the extent to which the premier was dealing in approximations.
Mr. Euro and Mr. Idiot
He behaved similarly when the intelligence service informed him there were indications that State Prosecutor Robert Biever could be involved in “serious activities” in the pedophile community in Esch, Luxembourg’s second-largest city. When Juncker later spoke to Biever about the issue, he turned the whole thing into a joke, saying: “Are you even aware that you have a whorehouse in Esch?”
Having been informed of the alleged suspicions in such an unconventional manner, Biever later said, on the record, that he would have liked to have replied: “You idiot!”
Juncker’s image now fluctuates between two extremes, that of Mr. Euro and Mr. Idiot. The chairman of the investigative committee, Green Party lawmaker François Bausch, listed 13 points of concern in his report on the abuses in the SREL, including wiretapping, spying, trickery, keeping files on political opponents and accepting advantages.
“Juncker wanted to intervene, but he didn’t have enough time,” says Bausch. SREL chief Mille and the premier, he adds, had “often failed to inform or only broadly informed” the parliament.
Juncker, the former head of the Euro Group, readily admitted that the “secretive world of the intelligence service” was not his top priority. “There were many important issues at the time, and there are still many issues today, that are near and dear to my heart.”
Rescuing the euro remains one of them.
Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan
Here is the German original version and the wonderful cartoon can be seen on our Facebook page, along with many interesting comments!
Eine geheimnisvolle Welt“
Wie Jean-Claude Juncker in eine groteske Affäre schlitterte
Der Blick des Großen auf den Kleinen ist selten frei von Herablassung. Wie sonst ließe sich erklären, dass deutsche Medien und Kommentatoren, Marietta Slomka im „heute journal“ zum Beispiel, die Vorgänge im Nachbarstaat Luxemburg „possierlich“ nennen? Das Großherzogtum hat einen Geheimdienst? Mit 60 Beamten? Oder soll man sagen: Agenten? Zum Totlachen!
„Luxemburg als solches zählt nicht“, mit dieser Feststellung hat die luxemburgische Zeitung „tageblatt“ die „Juncker-Tragödie“ kommentiert, die jenseits von Maas und Mosel natürlich nur als Komödie aufgefasst wird. Noch nicht einmal im Skandal wird der Kleinstaat (bitte, manche sagen sogar „Zwergstaat“) ernst genommen. Zu Unrecht.
Luxemburgs Premier Jean-Claude Juncker ist über eine Affäre zu Fall gekommen, die ihm der Nachrichtendienst des Landes, der Service de Renseignement de l’Etat luxembourgeois (SREL), beschert hat. Dieser Dienst, der sich um die äußere Sicherheit, aber auch um terroristische Gefahren kümmern soll, untersteht dem Regierungschef direkt. Deshalb trägt Juncker die politische Verantwortung für das Eigenleben, das Beamte des SREL mit illegalen Operationen jahrelang entfalteten. Das stellte ein Untersuchungsausschuss des Parlaments auf 141 Seiten fest. Ausführliche Einsprengsel auf Luxemburgisch im ansonsten französisch verfassten Dokument sorgen dafür, dass es keiner weiteren Verschlüsselung bedarf, um es für Außenstehende
schwer zugänglich zu machen. […] Sind Sie gespannt, wie es weiter geht? Zum Lesen der kompletten Ausgabe gelangen Sie hier zu unseren Angeboten.
Just found this article on our Group Facebook page:
LAX LUX and the
WIN-WIN SITUATION FOR THE BANK, in LUXEMBOURG EQUITY RELEASE SCHEMES
The 7 First Cunning Tricks of the Fraud (TO BE CONTINUED):
CUNNING TRICK 1. Registration of the loan ASAP (as soon as possible) with little respect for legal requirements, or legality of product in each country.
The miss-selling of a product which could never work, targeting in the main, vulnerable, susceptible pensioners with mortgage-free family homes, promising them an INCOME and a loan that would PAY FOR ITSELF, arising from their expert AAA prudent, low-risk investment. IN OTHER WORDS, LIES DAMN LIES AND STATISTICAL IMPOSSIBILITIES! The loan was CONTRACTED usually for 20 years.
CUNNING Commercial Agents and Fund managers using LUXEMBOURG visiting cards and brochures to ensure that the pensioners trusted in Landsbanki because it was a Luxembourg Bank running through Luxembourg, claiming AAA ratings and boasting incredible Annual Reports and showing the impressive glossy, documentation with its manipulated, false results right up until the bankruptcy.
CUNNING TRICK 2. To secure the deeds to the MORTGAGE-FREE family home under false pretences with the help of Notaries working with Landsbanki and not checking the legality of the product in the respective countries and with contracts in a foreign language.
CUNNING TRICK 3. For the bank to have control of the securities acquired with the funds retained by the bank for investment i.e A WIN- WIN SITUATION FOR THE BANK
CUNNING TRICK 4. ARTIFICIALLY DELAYING THE INSOLVENCY in order to allow time to deplete the clients accounts which led to the manipulated false margin call with house prices across Europe suddenly being dropped by unqualified people in Luxembourg to 60% of their already low estimation and a sudden drop in cash value by 5% by non- qualified analysis with again no backup or profession input. Just A ‘LUXEMBOURG SAYS SO’, which is unsustainable in Europe and is a WIN-WIN situation for the delinquent, failed bank.
LANDSBANKI WAS ALREADY INSOLVENT as shown in the icelandic procurer’s Indictment of 6 Landsbanki employees and the Official Insolvency was being ARTIFICIALLY DELAYED which surely breaches Insolvency Law EVEN IN LUXEMBOURG!
Once client’s funds were wasted, squandered recklessly on toxic products, Landsbanki, taking advantage of it’s artificial Insolvency delay, had the time needed to continue to acquire failing stock and shares often in the failing Icelandic Banks including in the already insolvent Landsbanki. It was Bankers’ Party Time with our money.
The rapid devaluation of this toxic portfolio gave the opportunity Landsbanki needed for it’s next cunning trick….to make a manoeuvred MARGIN CALL and then seize property .
CUNNING TRICK 5. GETTING HUGE LOAN FROM CBL to PLAY FOR TIME, artificially delaying the OFFICIAL insolvency and giving the bank the time it needed to trash our money by using our assets acquired under false pretences, as collateral as well as to transfer money out of Landsbanki.
Landsbanki Luxembourg incredibly gets a loan from the Central bank of Luxembourg CBL WITHOUT PROPER DUE DILIGENCE. CBL must have been aware that the Icelandic banks were sunk. Claude Trichet of the European Central Bank ECB telling them so in several meetings and being very displeased that CBL had granted this huge loan LUXEMBOURG COULD NOT AFFORD, to a failed bank in a climate of financial turmoil.
The Government must have been aware surely of the recklessness and the question of legality of ARTIFICIALLY DELAYING the DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY of a dead bank, so allowing clients’ accounts to be depleted and allowing the rotten traders to buy, without the clients’ consent, stocks and bond in all that was sinking in Iceland and NOTABLY buying Landsbanki’s own stocks and bonds WITH OUR MONEY and WITHOUT OUR CONSENT.
CUNNING TRICK NO 6 . The shocking S.C. R. signed off by a director of Landsbanki who knew full well this SCR manipulation was fabricated a couple of days before cessation of operations in order to create a FALSE DEBT AGAINST CLIENTS , from which followed the manoeuvered MARGIN CALL demanding money clients did not owe or their homes would be seized. There was no supporting analysis or justification for this fabrication. Only after 18 months were we shown any breakdowns of how they had arrived at the outrageous figures transforming creditors into debtors completely without credibility to any accountant. Surely no self-respecting accountant would have agreed to such nonsense?
CUNNING TRICK NO 7 The famous YVETTE HAMILIUS TRAIN which she WANTED US TO MISS.
Once the clients’ accounts were inexplicably depleted the manipulated false margin call could be made and Luxembourg’s Judiciary refused to see us as creditors even when the evidence was clear that the SCR methodology did not stand scrutiny. Landsbanki Equity Release Clients’ properties across Europe were suddenly devalued by unqualified people in Luxemebourg to 60% of their already low estimation and a sudden drop in cash value by 5% by non- qualified analysis with again no backup nor justification and 0 value placed on stocks and bonds.
As explanation: Just A ‘LANDSBANKI SAYS SO’, which is unsustainable in Europe and is a WIN-WIN situation for the delinquent, failed bank.
This led to Yvette Hamilius’ Train we were meant to miss and the date, which it suited them we miss.
WHAT DID THEY DO?
THROWING LEGAL ETHICS TO ONE SIDE, the date which had been fixed as the last delay to register our claim against the bank, was tip-toed into press very few clients would make a daily read. A handful of rarely read press was chosen.
What happened to the method of communication they were using to make their demands for money from US?
Were the demands for money also put in obscure press? NO,absolute NOT. Their demands for money were sent in a normal way when one wants to be sure the person receives this information. That is by mail, by email and directly to clients and/or their lawyers. Why choose to put something that is so important in a couple of press so few of them would see?
CLIENTS WERE IN A STATE OF SHOCK
a.) At all the lies they had been told by Landsbanki,
b.) That this AAA Luxembourg bank had gone bankrupt,
c.) That the Luxembourg Government had refused to give clients the 20.000 Euro compensation they were entitled to under European law
d.) That the false SCR had made them ineligible for this compensation by transforming them into DEBTORS
e.) That by such manipulation the Luxembourg Government could potentially save 12 million Euros!
These clients had already made their claim in Luxembourg.
These clients were simply told they were debtors and were brushed aside.
Then Yvette Hamilius said any claims were inadmissible if we had missed the date and Karine Guillaume the Judge Commisaire supervising her friend the administrator, seemed to find it within the ethics of Luxembourg Law to allow this sort of manoeuvre and to see everyone of the hundreds of victims systematically lose their case if they made the mistake of setting foot in Luxembourg and going to court!
It was all too easy to simply say as was said in the Luxembourg press:
“THEY SIMPLY MISSED THE TRAIN”
The Luxembourg press interviewed both Yvette Hamilius and her friend Robert Biever the Attorney General and they were quite happy to explain away the hundreds of victims losing their cases in conveyor-belt fashion regardless of the blinding evidence of gross manipulations, false accounting, embezzlement and harassment of victims in an inequitable way.
THIS WAS A WIN-WIN SITUATION FOR THE BANK !
In French :
OPINIONS SUR LA CRISE A LUXEMBOURG :
LE QUATRIEME SCANDALE MAJEUR EST UN DE TROP POUR ETOUFFER
1er SCANDALE — échec du Stadium National.
La Corruption incontrôlée
2e SCANDALE — CARGOLUX, KBL, les ventes BIL, Al Jazeera / SES,
3e SCANDALE — M.P. Et / Service secret de l’espionnage et les double agents secrets, les bombardements et la corruption incontrôlée,
4ème SCANDALE — L’ADMINISTRATION DE LANDSBANKI LUXEMBOURG -l’abus des victimes de corruption, de détournement de fonds, du fraude, du vente abusive et l harcèlement des retraités Européens dans une façon honteuse du point de vue étique et légale.
1er SCANDALE- projet immobilier combinée à un projet de Stade National où la corruption, les menaces, le chantage et des sérieuses activités diriger en sous-main entre les politiciens, les entrepreneurs et les écologistes – luttant avec tout le venin qui est mû de la cupidité et du désir de pouvoir ont amener a l’erreur du jugement qui a conduit finalement à l’échec du projet qui aurait grandement bénéficié la population du Luxembourg.
(NB Toutes les tentatives pour enquêter sur le chantage, les menaces et les actes illégaux ont été rejeté par le Parlement.)
Les habitants de Luxembourg étaient furieux, mais rien n’a été fait.
2e SCANDALE douteuse de fixation des prix et manipulations graves sur la vente sous Luc Frieden le ministre des Finances de 35% de Cargolux à Qatar Airways 117,5 millions de dollars. Puis il y eut les banques KBL et BIL vendus au Qatar ainsi que la douteuse liaison de la société Luxembourgeoise satellite SES avec Al Jazeera.
La fixation des prix, la manipulation, les transactions suspectes, mais encore une fois, toutes les tentatives pour enquêter sur toutes les menaces, méfaits, la manipulation des prix, etc. ont été rejetées par le Parlement de LUXEMBOURG.
Les habitants de Luxembourg étaient furieux, mais rien n’a été fait.
3e SCANDALE. Le chef de SREL, l’agence d’espionnage de Luxembourg avait il y a 4 ans, secrètement enregistrer une conversation entre eux et Mr.Juncker. Un dispositif d’enregistrement dans une montre-bracelet a été utilisé. M. Juncker, avait placé une taupe dans l’agence de l’espionnage SREL et restait informer par lui. Le P.M. M. Juncker n’a toutefois pris aucune mesure juridique, suite aux informations reçues. L’agence d’espionnage hors-contrôle était comme un avion sans pilote et le P.M., fermait les yeux sur le nombre croissant des scandales que lui et ses collègues semblaient penser pouvoir dissimuler simplement en les ignorant, ce qui peut être pourrait être vu aujourd’hui comme de l’arrogance insouciante.
Rien n a été fait jusqu’à ce que M. Juncker a pensé que c’était utile de faire une simple enquête qui servira peut-être à distraire le regard sur les autres scandales en arrière plan.
Cependant, le scandale à craindre le plus se profilait à l’horizon comme un nuage orageux prêt à éclater et ce scandale no 4. Concernait L’intérêt principal de Jean Claude Juncker:
La réputation de la PLACE FINANCIERE et le SECTEUR BANCAIRE
La réputation du Luxembourg comme Centre Financier digne de la ‘Confiance et du Respect’, que M. Juncker a demandé a l’Europe, était en jeu.
Une investigation correcte sur une faillite d’une Bank Luxembourgeoise délinquante que de plus, la BCL avait aider en lui accordant imprudemment un prêt qui avait retarder artificiellement la déclaration officielle de l’insolvabilité de Landsbanki Luxembourg, risquait des dommages a l’image que M. Juncker voulait peindre au monde sur la solidité morale et étique de la place Financière de Luxembourg.
C’est sans doute pourquoi aujourd’hui il est dit que c’était une une tactique habile qui a été utilisée pour manipuler l’attention du public et d’orienter les médias et regards du public loin du scandale de l’insolvabilité de Landsbanki Luxembourg avec ses longues tentacules qui conduisent à tout ce qui se trouve dans les eaux troubles en dessous.
Luxembourg avait fermé ses yeux et a ignoré toutes les procédures pénales dans toute l’Europe pendant 4 ans, tandis que le pouvoir judiciaire ignorer toutes les évidences que d’autres pays examinaient au plus haut niveau.
Le plus grand caution 50 millions d’euros ordonnées par le juge pénal le plus élevé en France, le Judge Renaud Van Rumbeyke, a été tout simplement ignoré par le pouvoir judiciaire. L’amende de 1.875.000 euros a été non seulement pas payé, mais a été nié dans un communiqué de presse par Robert Biever, le procureur de l’Etat!
Il y a eu des inculpations pénales en Islande et des liens clairs avec le détournement, la fraude et les manipulations d’argent sont vus aller systématiquement par le Luxembourg et pourtant l’article sur cette question et les questions demander par Serge Wilmes au Parlement et la courte réponse par la nouvelle ministre de la Justice, fait référence à des problèmes ICELANDAISES, plutôt que quelque chose à voir avec le Luxembourg, tandis que le administrateur et son superviseur disent simplement qu’il n’y a pas de problème qui doit être enquêter dans le dossier Landsbanki Luxembourg.
Cela commence à ressembler à un disque rayé, qui a été trop joué au Luxembourg quand vous regardez la façon dont les 3 derniers scandales ont été traités !
Pourtant, ce scandale est dit être le plus grand scandale financier en Europe avec le Luxembourg au centre de la complexité CRIMINELLES de détournement de fonds, fraude et l’abus des personnes âgées. Le scandale de l’administration de Landsbanki Luxembourg fait l’objet de Conférences Internationales sur les scandales des procédures d’insolvabilité ratée, avec Landsbanki Luxembourg étant citée comme le pire en Europe.
Un scandale complexe qui cours beaucoup plus profond que ce qui apparaît sur la surface.
Quelque chose devait être fait, car une plainte pénale avait été déposée au Luxembourg, aussi il y avait une procédure pénale en bonne voie en Islande, en France et des procédures en Espagne. Les juges civils en Espagne et en France prennent conscience de la gravité de la procédure pénale à mesure qu’ils avancent.
Distraction était nécessaire d’urgence pour maintenir ce scandale à la baie.
M. Juncker avait décidé de révéler SCANDALE no 3 pensant peut-être qu’il pourrait être contrôlée et que cela mènerait à une petite enquête à faible risque, ce qui lui ferrait passer bien avant les élections et surtout, prendrait l’attention loin d’un scandale au sein de la Financière centre bancaire, a éviter a tout prix.
Cependant, les choses ne se passent pas comme prévu car le Parlement n’a pas osé, vis a vis les Luxembourgeois, de voter pour le 3ieme Scandale pour la troisième fois, CONTRE une investigation officiel.
Deux fois peut-être. Trois fois NON.
Deux fois, ils ont voté NON à une enquête sur les 2 premiers scandales et les Luxembourgeois ont été fumants de colère. Trois fois, c’était trop. L’investigation n’était pas si petite que prévue et bien des choses ont été dévoilées.
Aussi un groupe de victimes de Landsbanki avait déposé une plainte pénale au Luxembourg , le jeune membre du Parlement Luxembourgeois, Serge Wilmes déposa une motion au Parliment et a eu des questions pour la nouvelle ministre de la Justice Octavia Modert au sujet du scandale qui se profile.
Ce qui était peut-être censé être une distraction simple afin de distraire l’attention loin du SCANDALE LANDSBANKI, s’est transformé en une enquête parlementaire, comme cela aurait dû être pour le scandale 1 et SCANDALE 2 .
Inévitablement, à partir de cette simple enquête sur SCANDALE 3, beaucoup a été révélés, mais en laissant de nombreux non-dits et les gens de Luxembourg se sont rendu compte qu’il y en avait encore des scandales cachée.
Il y avait des procédures judiciaires dans une vieille série d’attentats terroristes sur le Luxembourg a travers 25 ans, sur le Luxembourg même, avec des soupçons croissants qu’il s’agissait d’un complot ourdi par les forces de sécurité, avec la participation de l’ Agence d’Espionnage de Luxembourg SREL,que M. Juncker avait placé une taupe là et avaient fermer les yeux et a permis à l’agence d’espionnage à voler hors de contrôle, en négligeant les graves problèmes.
N.B. Ce petit pays de 550.000 habitants a une agence d’espionnage avec des dossiers sur plus de 300.000 personnes de Luxembourg!
L’espionnage sur leur propre peuple rends inévitable que personne n’ose dire quoi que ce soit dans un tel climat. Cela nous amène à la dissimulation du plus grand scandale financier en Europe.
SCANDALE NO 4. L’ADMINISTRATION de LANDSBANKI LUXEMBOURG
Celui qui ne va pas disparaître en dépit d’être ignoré pendant 5 ans et malgré les tentatives infructueuses de distraction pour attirer l’attention loin de ce scandale financier à la porte de Luxembourg.
Les centaines de victimes de vente abusive, du fraude, d’abus, de la manipulation, du harcèlement et du faux en écritures comptables , tout ceci confirmer et soutenu durant la procédure de l’administration, par Yvette Hamilius, ne disparaitront pas tranquillement, ni seront intimidés comme on l’avait espéré.
Les victimes ont attendu trop longtemps et ont été traités abominablement.
La plupart âgés dans leur 70 ans, un de 90 ans, ces retraités ont été traités comme des criminels par le Luxembourg, a travers l‘administrateur, Yvette Hamilius et son superviseur, laissant quelques plus jeunes dans leur soixantaine à se battre pour les centaines incapables tandis que même les avocats qui défendent 180 victimes ont été attaquées par l’administrateur pour exprimer ce que est ouvertement exprimé à travers l’Europe.
C’est un scandale au- delà des autres scandales et affecte l’Europe à bien des égards.
La ’ CONFIANCE et le RESPECT ‘ pour la Place Financière du Luxembourg, dont M. Juncker pontifia, ont disparu, de la même manière que l’effet cumulatif de tous ces scandales a créé la méfiance du gouvernement pour les habitants de Luxembourg, qui, comme les 600 victimes de ces abus, méritent mieux.
Les Luxembourgeois sont autant des victimes que les ex- employées de Landsbanki et les Ex-clients de Landsbanki le sont.
Il ne faut pas oublier que les liquidateurs et les conseillers juridiques de Landsbanki ont refuse catégoriquement tout négociation avec l’ALEBA tout comme les ex-clients ont été refuser toute investigation. Les ex-employées ont aussi été traité abominablement et ont été obligées de se diriger vers le Parliament Européen de justice. Suite a une grande et pénible bataille pour ces Luxembourgeois et leurs familles, la Cours de Cassation en Avril 2010 a renvoyé le dossier à la Cour de Justice de l’Union Européenne pour savoir si la directive Européenne avait été respectée. Yvette Hamilius et les conseillers juridique avaient tord et les employées ont fort heureusement eu droit a la justice après tant de humiliation et souffrance.
M. Juncker est déterminée à continuer comme avant et de devenir
‘Mr Europe n ° 1.,Ou «Monsieur Euro», mais continuera t-il à fermer les yeux sur ce qui va profondément mal dans son petit Luxembourg et de permettre aux crimes graves et des abominations éthiques et juridiques de continuer comme ils l’ont fait pendant si longtemps?
Voila la question qu’on se pose.
WE WILL GET ACTION FROM THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE, Nina !
This just came on our Group Facebook page.
EUROPEAN LAW PREVAILS OVER NATIONAL LAW.
This allows citizens to be protected from judicial abuse in member States and to be able to rectify the damage caused by this.
If we look at the shameful case of the way the Luxembourg employees of the delinquent Landsbanki Luxembourg were treated by the Insolvency administration in Luxembourg, you will see how important the European Courts are.
They ensure proper justice is served and damages are defined for the victims as well as applying sanctions and fines in the offending member State.
In States where there is little or improper supervision this corrective measure is all important and in states which are financial and banking Centres this is essential so that rulings and Laws are not made to fit the agenda of what suits the financial sector best, disregarding the rights of those who consume the financial products. Therefore Luxembourg provided services must not just comply with Luxembourg Law which seems to favour the banking sector, but also with the stricter European Law.
The citizens of Europe need to be protected against infringements of European Law by Member States, such as seen in the case of the abused ex-employees of Landsbanki Luxembourg who suffered, like we have, under the failed administration of a failed bank in Luxembourg where European Laws for the protection of European citizens were clearly breached, with Yvette Hamilius as administrator who lost the case in the European Courts. This just shows how shamefully bad the supervision of this insolvency has been and just why it is such a European Scandal today.
The role of European Parliament as legislator is increasing and so censures judgements that are contrary to the European Community treaty.
En Français pris de notre page Facebook:
DROIT EUROPEEN prévoit SUR LE DROIT NATIONAL.
Cela permet aux citoyens d’être protégés contre les abus judiciaires dans les Etats membres et d’être en mesure de rectifier les dommages causés.
Si nous regardons le cas honteux de la façon dont les salariés de la banque délinquante, Landsbanki Luxembourg ont été traités par l’administration de Luxembourg, vous verrez à quel point les tribunaux Européens de l’Union Européen sont indispensables.
Ils assurent qu’une bonne justice soit servie et que les dommages sont définis pour les victimes ainsi que l’application de sanctions et d’amendes dans l’État membre incriminé.
Dans les États où il y a peu ou mauvaise supervision, cette mesure corrective est très important surtout dans les Etats qui sont des centres financiers et bancaires. C’est essentiel afin que les décisions et les lois ne soient pas faites pour s’adapter à l’ordre du jour de ce qui convient mieux au secteur financier, au mépris des droits de ceux qui consomment les produits financiers.
Par conséquent les produits financiers fournis a travers le Luxembourg ne doivent pas seulement se conformer à la loi luxembourgeoise qui semble privilégier le secteur bancaire, mais aussi avec le droit Européen qui est plus strict et qui cherche a protégé d’avantage le consommateur.
Les citoyens Européens doivent être protégés contre les violations du droit communautaire par les États membres, comme vu dans le cas des ex-salariés victimes d’abus de Landsbanki Luxembourg qui ont souffert, comme nous avons, sous l’administration en échec, d’une banque en faillite au Luxembourg où les lois Européennes pour la protection des citoyens Européens ont été clairement violées, avec Yvette Hamilius en tant qu’administrateur qui a perdu l’affaire devant les tribunaux Européens. Cela montre à quel point la supervision de cette insolvabilité a été honteuse et aussi pourquoi c’est devenu un tel scandale Européen aujourd’hui.
Le rôle du Parlement Européen en tant que législateur s’élargis et il censure les jugements qui sont contraires au traité de la Communauté Européenne.